|
The right to
life
We come from Africa, Latin America, North America, Asia and Europe.
We gathered together in l998* with no other legitimacy or representativeness
than that of being citizens concerned by the fact that 1.4 billion
of the planet’s 5.8 billion inhabitants do not have access to drinking
water, the fundamental source of life. This fact is intolerable. Now,
the risk is great that in the year 2020 when the world population
reaches around S billion human beings, the number of people without
access to drinking water will increase to more than 3 billion. This
is unacceptable. We can and must prevent the unacceptable becoming
possible. How?
We think that we can do this by applying the principles and rules
outlined below
*In Lisbon, Valencia (Spain) and Lisbon again on the initiative of
the Group of Lisbon and the Mario Soares Foundation, thanks to the
financial support from the C. Gulbenkian Foundation, the Instituto
tin Agua, the Grupo IPE-Aguas do Portugal |
|
Water " the source of life " belongs to all the inhabitants
of the Earth in common
As
the fundamental and irreplaceable "source of life" for the eco-system,
water is a vital good, which belongs to all the inhabitants of the
Earth in common. None of them, individually
or as a group, can be allowed the right to make it private property.
Water is the patrimony of mankind. Individual and collective health depends upon it.
Agriculture, industry and domestic life are intimately linked to it.
Its "unsubstituable" character means that the whole human community
— and each of its members — must have the right of access to water,
and in particular, drinking water, in the necessary quantity and quality
indispensable to life and economic activity. There is no production
of wealth without access to water. Water is not like any other resource
it is not an exchangeable, marketable commodity. |
|
The right to water is an inalienable individual and collective right
Water
belongs more to the economy of common goods and wealth sharing than
to the economy of private and individual accumulation and other’s
wealth expropriation. While the sharing of water has often been
a major source of social inequality in the past, today’s civilisations
recognise that access to water is a fundamental, inalienable individual
and collective right. The right to water is a part of the basic
ethics of a "good" society and a "good" economy. It is up to society
as a whole and at the different levels of social organisation to
guarantee the right of access, according to the double principle
of co-responsibility and subsidiarity, without discrimination of
race, sex, religion, income or social class.
|
|
Water has to contribute to the strengthening of solidarity among
people, communities, countries, genders, generations
Fresh
water resources are unequally distributed on the Earth. Income also.
This does not mean that there also must be inequality of access
to water between people and communities and regions. Moreover, the
inequality in the distribution of water and —financial wealth does
not mean that the people rich in water and rich in revenue can make
use of it as they please, indeed sell it (or buy it) "abroad" to
derive the maximum profit (or pleasure). In many regions of the
world water remains a source of inequalities between men and women
the latters bearing all the burden of homework dependent on water.
These inequalities must be removed. There are still too many water-related
wars ongoing on our Planet because most States continue to use water
as an instrument in support of their geo-economic strategic interests
as regions’ c hegemonic power. It is necessary and possible to make
water free from the influence of a hegemony-oriented State. Water
is a "respublica".
|
|
Water is the citizens’ business
Creating
the conditions necessary to ensure the most effective and sustainable
access to water is everybody’s concern.. It is also an inter-generational
issue so that it is up to present generations to use, valorise,
protect and conserve water resources in such a way that future generations
can enjoy the same freedom of action and choice that we wish for
ourselves today. The citizen must be at the centre of decision-making.
The integrated and sustainable management of water belongs to the
sphere of democracy. It goes beyond the skills and to the know-how
of technicians, engineers and bankers. Tile users have a key role
to play by their choices and practices to ensure environmental,
economic and societal sustainability.
|
|
Water policy implies a high degree of democracy at the local, national,
continental and world level
By
definition, water calls for decentralised management and transparency.
The existing institutions of representative democracy must be strengthened.
When necessary, new forms of democratic government have to be created.
Participatory democracy is unavoidable. This is possible, with or
without the new information and communication technologies, at the
level of local communities, cities, basins, regions. New coherent
regulatory frameworks at international and global level must be
designed and implemented, enhancing the visibility of a sustainable
water policy at global level by the global community. Parliaments
are the natural loci and players in this respect. This is why we
also believe that it is urgent and essential to (re)valorise local
and traditional water harvesting practices. An important heritage
of knowledge, skills and community based practices, highly efficient
and sustainable, has been dilapidated and run down. It runs the
risk of being destroyed still further in the years to come.
|
|
Access to water necessarily takes place through partnership. It
is time to go beyond the logic of "warlords" and economic conflicts
for the domination and conquest of markets
Citizenship
and democracy arc founded on co-operation and mutual respect. They
exist by and through partnership. "Partnerships for water" is the
inspiring principle behind all the plans (such as "the river agreements")
that have permitted the efficient resolution of conflicts which
in certain regions of the world have traditionally poisoned relationships
between riverside communities who shared the same hydrographic basin.
Indeed, we support a real local/national/world and real public/private
partnership. A sustainable water management in the general interest
cannot but be founded on the respect for cultural diversity and
socio-economic pluralism. A partnership predominantly subject, as
at present, to the logic and interests of private actors in relentless
competition against each other for market conquest could only do
harm to the objectives of access to water for all and global integrated
sustainability.
|
|
We believe that the financial responsibility for water must be at
once collective and individual according to the principles of responsibility
and utility
Ensuring
access to water for the vital and fundamental needs of every person
and every human community is an obligation for society as a whole.
It is society which must collectively assume all of the costs related
to the collection, production, storage, distribution, use, conservation
and recycling of water in view of supplying and guaranteeing access
to water in the quantities and qualities considered as being the
indispensable minimum. The costs (including the negative externalities
which are not taken into account by market prices) are common social
costs to be borne by the collective as a whole. This principle is
even more relevant and significant at the level of a country, a
continent and the world society. The financing must be ensured by
collective redistribution. The mechanisms of individual price-fixing,
according to progressive pricing must start from a level of water
usage that goes beyond the vital and indispensable minimum. Beyond
the vital minimum, progressive pricing must be a function of the
quantity used. Finally, at a third layer, all abuses and excesses
of usage must be considered illegal.
|
|
Proposals
In
order that the rules become a living reality in the course of the
next 20 to 25 years, when two billion human beings will be
added to the present population, we propose that the following measures
be taken and implemented in a kind of "World Water Contract" alongside
two main axes:
• the
creation of a ‘Network of Parliaments for Water"
• the
promotion of information campaign, awareness raising and mobilisation
on "Water for MI".
We
also propose the establishment of a World Observatory for Water
Rights.
|
|
The Creation of a Network of Parliaments for Water
It
is in Parliaments, the principal organs of political representation
in "westernised" societies, and in comparable institutions, in other
civilisational contexts, that the responsibility falls, to modify
the existing legislation by applying the principles and rules outlined
above. Defining a new legal framework at local and national levels
but also at the international and world level is a major task for
Parliaments to fill up the void that exists in this domain at the
world level.. The priority is to establish a "World Water Treaty"
legalising water as a vital patrimonial good, common to all humanity.
This "treat/’, for example, should exclude water from all international
commercial conventions (such as those existing within the framework
of the World Trade Organisation), as is already the case for the
cultural domain.
|
|
Promotion of information campaigns, awareness-raising and mobilisation
concerning
1. the
development (or modernisation) of the systems of water distribution
and sanitation for the 600 cities in Russia, African. Asian,
Latin American and European countries which will have more than
a million inhabitants by the year 2020 and whose water system is
even today obsolete, inadequate, indeed, non-existent.
2. The
fight against new sources of water pollution in the cities
of North America, Western Europe and Japan where contamination of
the soil and both surface and deep ground water, is becoming more
and more troubling, serious and in certain cases, irreversible.
These
actions would respond to the objective of "3 billion taps" by 2020.
NGO’s,
trade unions and scientists have in this respect an essential and
determining role to play.
To these
purposes, prioritv should be given to
The
structural reform of irrigation systems in highlv intensive industrial
agriculture
The
solutions exist already such as, for example, "drip irrigation".
Existing
"modern" agriculture is the principal consumer of the planet’s freshwater
resources (accounting for 70% of total world extraction, of which
the largest part is for irrigation). Yet, 40% of irrigation water
is lost en route from source to sink). Furthermore, industrial
agriculture is source of major damages and threats to the environment
(soil salinity and hydromorphism in particular)
A
10 to 15 year-moratorium in the construction of new
large dams which have so far created considerable short- and
long-term problems for the environment, local populations and the
possibility of integrated, sustainable water management.
|
|
The establishment of a World Observatory for Water Rights.
The main goal
of this observatory will be to collect, produce, distribute and
disseminate the most rigorous and reliable information possible
on water access from the point of view of individual and collective
rights, water production, its use, its conservation/ protection
and democratic sustainable development. The Observatory _ must become
one of the world reference points for information on water rights,
in support of the most effective forms of water partnership and
solidarity.
|
|
Members of the Committee for the World Water Contract
Mario Soares,
former President of die Republic of Portugal
Mario Albornos, Professor at the University of Quilmès, Argentina
Raoul Alfonsin, former President of the Republic of Argentina
Driess Ben Sari, Professor at Rabat University, Morocco
Rafaeil Blasco Castany. Presidencia de Is Generalitat Valenciana
Rinaldo Bontempi, Member of the European Parliament, Italy
Larbi Bouguerra, President of the Group of Lausanne, Tunisia
David Brubaker, Global Resource Action for the Environment.
USA
Joao Caraça, Director at the Gulbenkian Foundation. Portugal
Susan George. Assistant-director of the Transnationat Institute,
USA/France
Antonio Gonçalves Henriques, Vice-President of the Institute
of Water, Portugal
Pierre-Marc Johnson, Heenan Blaikie Consultancy, Mc Gill
University, Canada
S.A.R. Le Prince Laurent, President of the Royal Institute
for the Sustainable Management of Natural Resources, Belgium
Candido Mendes, Senator, President of the Candido Mendes
University
Hasna Moudud, President. The National Association for Resources
Improvement. Bangladesh
Sunita Narain, Assistant-director for the Science and Environment
Centre. India
José Antonio Pinto Monteiro, Minister of the Environment.
Cape Verde
Frédéric Ténière-Buchot, Mission for Water, United Nations
Environment Programme, France
Abou Thiam, Professor at the University of Dakar, Senegal
Lars Ulmgrend, general Secretary of the Stockholm International
Water Institute, Sweden
Anders Wijknsan, Director at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Sweden
Riccardo Petrella, Secretary of the Committee, President
of the Group of Lisbon, Italy
For further
information and interest to sustain the Water Manifesto and its
proposals, please contact:
The Global Water Contract. A Citizen Initiative
Provisionnal addresses:
30 Rue Monrose - B1030- Brussels - Belgium - Fax: +32 2 2452108
A. Cordeiro,
Mario Soares Foundation, rua S. Bento 176 - P1200 - Lisbon - Portugal
- Fax: 351-1-3964156
European University
of Environment, 6 rue de Chantilly - F75009 - Paris - France - Fax:
33-1-42812578
|
|